To me, the concept of the sacred has to do more with how we talk about or do things, and with whom and when and where and how often. Sometimes I wonder if we really even grasp what it is to reverence something. I guess it's no wonder since we see so few examples of what doing that should look like. I think this is why the liturgical traditions of the Anglican church are appealing to me (in part) - because they provide tangible and participatory reminders of my humanity and the "other-ness" of God. In turn, these reminders point me to the dignity inherent in all of creation because of the "other-ness" of its Creator . . . and in light of that, I am challenged to think about whether what I talk about, the things I laugh at, the clothes I wear, and the movies I watch are helping me (and those around me) to reflect this innate dignity and beauty of creation. Good things to think about on a rainy Monday . . .
06 April 2009
reclaiming the sacred
I am often struck by the realization that not much seems sacred in our culture anymore . . . in a world where dialogue about anything & everything is so highly valued (via the news, blogs, movies, twittering, commercials), a great vacuum of meaninglessness has resulted in the midst of all the information. Discretion? Restraint? Neither are things I see evidence of very often. Instead it seems that the leading ideals of the day are to tell all, show all, do all, watch all - because in doing so, you are (supposedly) demonstrating your arrival at some pinnacle of cultural sophistication or maturity. Don't get me wrong: I'm not an opponent of free speech and I don't think there are topics that should be off limits. But it seems that the pendulum has swung too far when the idea that giving certain things a special place or respect (like how I talk about sexuality or God, how I present myself, how I use my Sundays) is something rarely seen or heard - much less valued.
No comments:
Post a Comment